User talk:Cullendesac
Cullendesac, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Cullendesac! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC) |
Edit War warning
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Satrar (talk) 13:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Moreover, you are supposed to understand the Wikipedia policy regarding WP:ASSERT. Please read WP:VAGUE and take some time off to apprise yourself on the subject. You are adding Peacock terms in the article and according to the policy these terms must be removed no matter how well cited they are. So my advice for you to spent some time on educating yourself and in the mean while please feel free to start a fan site. Happy editing. Satrar (talk) 14:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)