User talk:Cvhcsee

File copyright problem with File:7thHeavenS4.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:7thHeavenS4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:7thHeavenS10.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:7thHeavenS10.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One Tree Hill

First off, we can't just list recurring characters, they need to be sourced. If there's a "casting" section, then all the information will be there and we don't just list things. A "starring" section for series regulars is only there because of the episode list. The infobox cuts into the episode list and that can't happen. Which is why the DVD releases get removed sometimes. The DVD release is fine because it's already in the article and sourced, no information is being removed. If you want recurring characters somehow listed, the way to do it is shown on the episode list of Season 8: One Tree Hill (season 8). Adding them into the episode summary is allowed. Jayy008 (talk) 14:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you can change the color from white to another, then feel free. I don't know how to do it. Jayy008 (talk) 14:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's incorrect. The pages you've shown aren't in guidelines. It's Original airdate/production code/viewers. However, I don't even think production code is allowed anymore. Jayy008 (talk) 10:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS. sorry it took me so long to check. But I've checked and the order you're changing is old, for an example of a good article see Smallville (season 10) for how something should look. Jayy008 (talk) 10:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits because you changed the order incorrectly. Jayy008 (talk) 18:44, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the order I like, I personally have no preference. It's only season 1 and 2 that need changing. I'm not asking you to change it. Jayy008 (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very good, thanks! Jayy008 (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox references

Thanks for adjusting the hatnote in Mash Off to use the standard template. I've done the same for the article at the other end.

I did wonder, however, at your removal of the reference for the next episode in the infobox. We've typically referenced all unaired episodes in this way wherever mentioned until the episode actually airs, at which point the episode titles are no longer deemed to require references in articles, infoboxes or other places. Can you let me know the rationale or the Wikipedia policy/page that militates against using a reference for unaired episode articles? Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Please reply here, so we can keep the conversation in one place. I appreciate it. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I confess that did not remove the reference according to Wikipedia policies. I did it to preserve the beauty of the infobox. Besides, there's other places -not precisely in the article- where I can put the reference to the next episode. I apologize for the inconvenience, I did it once before and now, there's no reason for me to do it again. Just remember after the next episode airing, remove the reference. Thanks. Cvhcsee (talk) 04:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We always do remove the references shortly after airing. I'm not fond of the look of references in the infobox, myself, but it's only for a short period of time, and it's important to show that the title does not come out of thin air, or worse, from an unreliable source. Thanks for responding so quickly. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Come Rain or Come Shine: From Grey's Anatomy to Private Practice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private Practice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Women in Prison (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dick Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cvhcsee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cvhcsee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cvhcsee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Taylor

Replied. Thanks for starting the discussion. James26 (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for improving the series articles. Have my bests Cvhcsee (talk) 01:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 15:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, we use seasons because years eventually don't mean anything. In 10 years time, somebody watching season 2 is going to have to research when season 2 was aired in order to find out what year season 2 was aired so they can work out who the distributor was. Reagrding your edit summary "Says who? Then you might start changing all other series too. Consider to start a discussion on Article`s talk page", use of seasons instead of years is standard practice. If you find years used in other articles, you should be fixing them, not introducing inconsistencies into articles that correctly use seasons. As for "Consider to start a discussion on Article`s talk page", since it was your edit that was opposed, it's really up to you to start a discussion, not me, and you shouldn't edit-war just to get your version into an article! --AussieLegend (✉) 16:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have u ckeckd the Television Infobox talk page? Either Seasons or years are accepted, and I`m with the vast majority of other series in the same case. I dont understand why it is "getting my version" and I dont understand the attacks since I always respect the MOSs. Cvhcsee (talk) 16:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know all about the infobox talk page. I've edited the infobox, the documentation page and the talk page many times over many years. The infobox instructions don't say that years or seasons are accceptable. For most fields the instructions say not to include them.

I dont understand why it is "getting my version" - Quite simply, you've made a bold edit and it has been opposed. Per WP:STATUSQUO, if you make an edit which is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit—leave the status quo up, or try an alternative way to make the change that includes feedback from the other editor. This is done by starting a discussion on the talk page. Repeatedly reverting like this is edit-warring and is unnaceptable. If you don't discuss the edits and persist in reverting to your preferred version of the article you may be blocked from editing. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:7thHeavenS10.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:7thHeavenS10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]