User talk:Cyber17

April 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Neymar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. I've asked you to stop making your ridiculous changes to this article, adding non-npov material and peacock terms, changing stuff that is reffed, now you added back in the IP rubbish about football manager as well. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 23:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 23:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber, Captain Screebo is correct in their edits. Your edits to Neymar did not improve the article since they suffered from poor grammar and punctuation and did not treat the subject in a neutral manner as required by Wikipedia's guidelines. Drmies (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You are obviously also User:ThunderBolt17, who is now indefinitely blocked, and see below. Further infractions might be met with an indefinite block, for various grounds--if you sock again, for WP:SOCKing; if you insert disruptive edits again (grammatically highly deficient and containing such claims as how you discovered Neymar), for lack of competency, besides disruption etc. Drmies (talk) 16:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for socking and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 16:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marco van Ginkel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]