User talk:DDT Fair Trade

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eighth Army (United Kingdom)[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eighth Army (United Kingdom). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Acts of Union 1707, you may be blocked from editing. Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:59, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Acts of Union 1707, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Finealt (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 15:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

an indian moslem?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DDT Fair Trade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i made that article on history of islam a year ago. that is not vandalism. that is my article. and why is an indian moslem getting involved? zippy? DDT Fair Trade (talk) 15:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided; and regardless, there's no such thing as "your article" on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:05, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.