User talk:D P:CIAGENT-WSFW

Welcome!

Hello, D P:CIAGENT-WSFW, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 02:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alvin Colina may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[File:]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alvin Colina has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alvin Colina was changed by D P:CIAGENT-WSFW (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95084 on 2014-05-09T17:28:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Alvin Colina. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alvin Colina. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
I understand what you are doing, but you need to take any issues to the talk page of the article or the user; you can also report the situation to the administrators' noticeboard. 331dot (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will again advise you to express any concerns you have about the Alvin Colina article on its talk page; any content that is cited with a source is valid content as long as it is expressed in a neutral POV, that includes arrests and convictions. 331dot (talk) 00:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Alvin Colina shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 331dot (talk) 00:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final notice

I will once more urge you to post your concerns with the article at Talk:Alvin Colina for discussion, or at least give a specific reason for your reversions; if you do not do so, I will report you as engaged in an edit war. 331dot (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]