User talk:Danpiedra

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Thomas More Law Center has been reverted, as it would appear to constitute vandalism. I'm currently in the process of trying to sort out the edit history, and if you would like to help in the process, it would be much appreciated. I would advise you to add your thoughts on the situation on the talk page for the aforementioned article. If you have any other questions, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks, and have a nice day. Legoland12342 (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:BrianRooney1.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:BrianRooney1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. dave pape (talk) 20:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:LtColChessani.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:LtColChessani.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Killiondude (talk) 08:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Chessani1.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Chessani1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:TMLC Pic.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:TMLC Pic.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Danpiedra. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Instawisdom (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AFLC Image.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AFLC Image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kings Point, New York, and conflict of interest[edit]

Hello Danpiedra. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kings Point, New York, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Please see Talk:Kings Point, New York, where another user has pointed out that the username of this account coincides with both the author of a newspaper story cited in the article and the owner of a website connected to issues in the article. I've suggested the other user find sources that present a counter-point; I'd also suggest that you find sources that are independent of all parties related to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 23:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be advised that I've opened a case at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard related to your edits to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 23:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Copyright Law portion[edit]

Hey! :) I saw that you gave a citation for the copyright law portion by citing the case itself. I was wondering if you had any sources which make this thing notable?(secondary sources generally establish notability) Thanks! WP:GNG For more info. (Thereandnot (talk) 04:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danpiedra. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.231.253.118 (talk) 23:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Self Published Sources[edit]

Hey! :) I wanted to share with you WP:SPS. That article was published self-published on the Yurshelemis own organizations website. Please note that self-published sources are not allowed on wikipedia and lower the quality of the encyclopedia. Also please take to avoid conflicts of interest on the encyclopedia. (Thereandnot (talk) 18:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 15:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Muise listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Robert Muise. Since you had some involvement with the Robert Muise redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]