User talk:Danpowpow

December 2021[edit]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Withania somnifera, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Your website here is spam, and your user name indicates you may be on Wikipedia to promote yourself, as you are the name behind the website. Notifying admin about these two violations. Zefr (talk) 20:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hammersoft (talk) 20:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danpowpow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm new to Wikipedia. I did not mean to spam. I am a herbal researcher and writer. I was adding research-backed content to the page, I linked back to my website because that's where all of the references are. Should I just directly cite the Pubmed/NCBI websites? I can do that, no problem. Again, I didn't mean to spam, I am new to Wikipedia and didn't know how to use the system properly. Danpowpow (talk) 23:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your links were incredibly inappropriate and have no place on an encyclopedia. That you thought they were shows you should remain blocked in order to protect Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.