User talk:Dark kut konijnXL

Welcome!

Hello, Dark kut konijnXL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Disfiguring the Goddess, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Disfiguring the Goddess

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Disfiguring the Goddess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

XCC

Will you further expand XCC, the article you've just created? To me, it looks like it may fulfill the WP:PROMO deletion criterion. AdAstra reloaded (talk) 13:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with XCC

Hello. Concerning your contribution, XCC, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.scribd.com/doc/8424015/What-is-the-Entity-of-the-New-UFCMMA#ad_unit=Doc_Sideboard_MediumRectangle_BTF_300x250&url=http%3A//www.scribd.com/doc/8424015/What-is-the-Entity-of-the-New-UFCMMA%23ad_unit%3DDoc_Sideboard_MediumRectangle_BTF_300x250%26url%3Dhttp%253A//www.scribd.com/doc/8424015/What-is-the-Entity-of-the-New-UFCMMA%26attributes%3DIABParent%253DSports%2526Extension%253Ddoc%2526AdLayout%253D-1472436212%2526DocUser%253D181192%2526IABChild%253DMartial%252520Arts%25252CBoxing%2526Document%253D8424015%2526FourGen%253DTrue%26skip%3D0&attributes=IABParent%3DSports%26Extension%3Ddoc%26AdLayout%3D-1472436212%26DocUser%3D181192%26IABChild%3DMartial%2520Arts%252CBoxing%26Document%3D8424015%26FourGen%3DTrue&skip=0. As a copyright violation, XCC appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. XCC has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:XCC and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:XCC with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:XCC.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AdAstra reloaded (talk) 13:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't just copy

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Removing Speedy at XCC

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from XCC, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at XCC, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 15:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at XCC

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with XCC. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 20:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Impericon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impericon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impericon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]