User talk:David Ricksonberg

January 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Rael Levitt, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Allegation of Neutral Point of View denied. Previous version makes reference to television show in main body of the wikipedia page (tabloid media) and comments by Fiona Forde (sensationalist single journalist). Levitt was not convicted of fraud and is not under investigation of fraud. Gratuitous mentions that "Levitt was convicted of violating parts of the NCC which was then overturned" means Levitt DID NOT violate those parts of the NCC. Gratuitous references to overturned legal decisions have been constructed to purposefully tarnish Levitt on this page.

Edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rael Levitt. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Rael Levitt. Bbb23 (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

The Version of rael Levitt's Biography Page edited by Bbb23 is completely fabricated and in breach of Wikipedia's Biography of Living Person Policy. It makes lengthy references to TV program on a sensationalist news channel and negative articles written by a tabloid Journalist (Fiona Forde). The facts of Rael Levitt's vendor bidding dispute are: 1. A dispute occurred over a property brought to auction by Rael Levitt. 2. Due to negative media attention Rael Levitt Stepped down as CEO of Auction Alliance. 3. In a series of court cases that followed, Rael Levitt was found NOT GUILTY of various fraud allegations raised against him. Anything else is purely conjecture.

See proposed version below which is much more accurate and less sensationalist: In 2012, a dispute arose over a property that Rael Levitt brought to public auction. The dispute was covered extensively in the media and Levitt stepped down as CEO of Auction Alliance and as a member of the national auction association. In a series of court cases that followed, Levitt was vindicated of the fraud charges laid against him. Various local and provincial divisions of South African courts held that Levitt was not guilty of fraud.

(David Ricksonberg (talk) 08:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC))