User talk:DeMimovingdg7
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DeMimovingdg7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ARoseWolf 17:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
[edit] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ServiceMaster, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 14:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi friend! I believed the edits to be constructive - I removed content that was grossly outdated and had no citations. I also moved some content that seemed better suited elsewhere. I made some additional edits and it looks like our paths crossed on those! Please let me know if there are any other issues with that particular page. Thanks!! DeMimovingdg7 (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Demandbase, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wesoree (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- I see you just removed all the updates I made to Demandbase. All of the content came from reliable sources so I am confused? Can you please elaborate? DeMimovingdg7 (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- pinging @Wesoree: --ARoseWolf 19:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- actually sorry Wesoree (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- All of the additions were sourced, including updating of current sources in the article. A bot has fixed some syntax errors so we can't revert back to the previous updated version. You'll have to add the information back but that should be relatively easy from the article history. --ARoseWolf 12:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Wesoree, I understand that you are trying to protect the encyclopedia from vandalism and disruptive editing. I appreciate what you do. Mistakes will be made. Please be careful. Reverting good faith edits that meet the criteria can be as disruptive as adding unsourced and incomplete information. We are instructed to be bold and I encourage that but we also need to do it responsibly. Thank you for responding here.--ARoseWolf 12:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help! I will be adding that information back to the page! DeMimovingdg7 (talk) 18:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- @ARoseWolf I undid what @Wesoree removed and it was again immediately reverted by @Christiaanp These editors making multiple reversions per day don't seem to be looking at what they undoing or any history surrounding it. How can I best add this content back onto the page in order to avoid this? Thank you for your help! DeMimovingdg7 (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've begun a discussion on the article's talk page but first I had to create the talk page. Hopefully they respond. I'm completely indifferent towards the subject but it seems your edits are non-controversial and they are properly sourced. I looked at previous versions and I don't see any reason, on the surface, for why these edits should be reverted. Be prepared to discuss should they have concerns. Remember that the ultimate goal is consensus and the best way to achieve it is through civil discussion. --ARoseWolf 18:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- I undid what @Christiaanp done on Demandbase Wesoree (talk) 18:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Wesoree, I understand that you are trying to protect the encyclopedia from vandalism and disruptive editing. I appreciate what you do. Mistakes will be made. Please be careful. Reverting good faith edits that meet the criteria can be as disruptive as adding unsourced and incomplete information. We are instructed to be bold and I encourage that but we also need to do it responsibly. Thank you for responding here.--ARoseWolf 12:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- All of the additions were sourced, including updating of current sources in the article. A bot has fixed some syntax errors so we can't revert back to the previous updated version. You'll have to add the information back but that should be relatively easy from the article history. --ARoseWolf 12:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- actually sorry Wesoree (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- pinging @Wesoree: --ARoseWolf 19:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)