User talk:Devardhi
May 2024[edit]
Hello, Devardhi, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 10:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Vimalsagarsuri. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Prem Suri. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 08:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Wikishovel,
- Thank you for your message and for your diligence in maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia page on Prem Suri. I appreciate your concern regarding the edits I made. I understand the importance of collaborative editing and reaching a consensus among editors.
- I believe the content I added contributes valuable information to the page and helps improve its accuracy and comprehensiveness. However, I am fully committed to resolving any disagreements and reaching a consensus with fellow editors.
- I would like to discuss the changes further on the article's talk page to address any concerns and find a version that represents the consensus of the community. I'm open to feedback and suggestions on how we can improve the content while maintaining Wikipedia's standards.
- Thank you for your understanding and patience as we work through this. I'm eager to collaborate and ensure that the Wikipedia page on Prem Suri reflects the best possible information available.
- Best regards,
- Devardhi Jain Devardhi (talk) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Devardhi, you've been tagged on Talk:Prem Suri, yet instead of engaging in a discussion you ignored the comment. Let me remind you that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, where many editors work on a single article. — kashmīrī TALK 10:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.