User talk:DilmaEmperatriz

Welcome to Wikipedia. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that all articles should remain open to editing by all users. Whilst in rare cases we will protect a page to prevent vandalism, this protection is usually short-term. We do not permit one user or group of users to have sole access to edit an article; indeed, the software on which Wikipedia operates does not even support such a function. We absolutely will not permit the subject of an article to control the content of the article about them; this would be in complete contravention of Wikipedia's neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion, nor is it a social media outlet.
For more information about writing about yourself on Wikipedia, please see our guidance on the topic (the succinct summary of which is: don't write about yourself on Wikipedia). Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, DilmaEmperatriz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DilmaEmperatriz. The focus of your editing and the nature of some of your posts is giving off the impression that you may be connect to Carmen María Montiel in some way. Wikipedia doesn't expressly forbid COI editing, but it does highly discourage it because it can lead to some serious problems. If you are connected to Montiel in some way, it's very important that you understand this and follow the guidelines explained in Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide because you are likely going to have problems if you don't. Moreover, if you're connected to Montiel and you or she have concerns about the content in the article, then be advised that they are ways for you to seek help in addressing them as explained in Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Relationship between the subject, the article, and Wikipedia.

What you need to stop doing is assuming that your way is the right way and that Montiel or anyone associated with her has editorial control over the article because neither of those things are true. You also need to assume good faith and stop claiming that anyone who disagrees with you must be connected to Montiel's ex-husband in some way. Articles are to be edited in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, not personal opinions or feelings; so, if you think an edit made by another needs to be undone, then please leave an edit sum explaining why and cite the relevant policy and guideline. If you think an edit should be undone, but are not sure; ask for help on the article's talk page. You're going to need to moderate your approach a little bit and learn to work with other editors; otherwise, you're eventually going to be seen as being here for some other reason than trying to improve Wikipedia and most likely going to find your account blocked for one reason or another. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Salvio giuliano. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, please note that per WP:OUTING, posting another editor's personal information is prohibited, whether such information is accurate or not. Per policy, unless unintentional and non-malicious, attempted outing is sufficient grounds for an immediate block. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors.

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 14:39, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I am considering your advice and looking forward to be a better Editor DilmaEmperqatriz

Carmen Maria Montiel

People do not get Wikipedia articles on the basis of what the article says, they get Wikipedia articles on the basis of how well the things it says can be supported by reliable source coverage in media. So there's no contradiction between the "delete" and the reasoning I gave to support it — even a person who's done something that would count as a valid notability claim still has to show the correct depth and quality of referencing before she actually gets an article out of it. She would be eligible to keep an article that was referenced properly, but having a notability claim does not entitle her to keep a poorly sourced article just because a notability claim was stated. Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]