User talk:DoctorNightmare

Removing sourced material

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Sam Weller (journalist) for a period of 3 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned several times to stop deleted material that was directly from a reliable source; you've been blocked from editing that article any more for now. I've opened up a discussion on our Biographies of living persons noticeboard regarding this article here. You are free to add your input to that discussion. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello DoctorNightmare. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Sam Weller (journalist), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DoctorNightmare. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DoctorNightmare|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]