User talk:DominicRoberti2K3

January 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wizards of Waverly Place have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wizards of Waverly Place was changed by DominicRoberti2K3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855318 on 2021-01-14T23:06:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wizards of Waverly Place, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing at Wizards of Waverly Place shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another 's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wizards of Waverly Place. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DominicRoberti2K3 reported by User:Geraldo Perez (Result: ). Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]