User talk:DonEladio

Welcome

Hello, DonEladio, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:06, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing issues

Please note that content in Wikipedia articles requires appropriate sourcing - places with reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight. The Blaze never meets those criteria. In addition, when the content is medically related, the sources must meet a higher threshold of medical peer review. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MEDRS, which I just read, says nothing of the kind for news articles. MEDRS policy, however, is to be used to confuse newbies about Wikipedia's rules in a feeble attempt to whitewash articles. DonEladio (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Vaccine controversies. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DonEladio reported by User:Yobol (Result: ). Thank you. Yobol (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]