User talk:Dopesickdotcom

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Dopesickdotcom, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Dopesick seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rob van vee 04:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to FBI: Most Wanted, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary. Stop with these edits! Rob van vee 05:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dopesick, you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 15:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a dictionary[edit]

I have asked you several times to please stop with the dictionary entries. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. If you want to make the sort of edits you are making please take them to Wiktionary. Continuing with this as well as your lack of communication here will result in an administrator revoking your editing privileges. Rob van vee 15:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dopesick. Rob van vee 17:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning and last plea. WP:ANI will be our next stop if you continue. Rob van vee 17:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread can be found here. Rob van vee 07:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. N.J.A. | talk 11:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]