User talk:Dunnigan 43

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunnigan 43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do nothing

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sock of blocked user. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 07:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit, this appears to be an evidential sock block, There is a CU request in at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JI Hawkins. Waiting for the outcome. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE) Please see user's filter log and the last edit of his contribution history. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 06:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunnigan 43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edit which I was blocked for wasn't vandalism, it was the fucking truth. I'm trying to save you guys from being enslaved by aliens here. Right fucking now the government's collaborating with an evil race of aliens. The resistance organized by Sanders is strong, but they need all the help they can get, because the agreed colonization date is December 21, 2012. If they haven't been stopped by then, all bets are off.

Decline reason:

That's ok, I'm wearing my tinfoil hat ... we'll all be fine without your socking. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunnigan 43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As previously stated, I've got nothing but the best intentions. My edits aren't vandalism, they're facts.

Decline reason:

There is no rule prohibiting people with mental illnesses from contributing to Wikipedia, and indeed many people with mental illnesses are useful and valued contributors. However, if the nature of your illness makes it impossible for you to distinguish between reality and nonreality, and if you aren't able to compensate for your illness by limiting yourself to only writing about verifiable facts, then it won't be possible for you to edit here. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm just trying to raise awareness of the government conspiracy and the best way of doing that is by Wikipedia. It's not right to block someone for trying to save the world.

Dunnigan 43 (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]