User talk:Dyalnism

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Jerm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Curly Howard have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. Jerm (talk) 19:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Epperson House. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Levi_OP^Talk 20:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richard Henry Pratt, you may be blocked from editing. Yoshi24517 ^Chat _{Very Busy} 20:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Pahunkat (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]