Jump to content

User talk:Editchi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Junk2711. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkish Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The source you added says there are 25 787-9s, 10 737-9MAXs and 65 737-8MAXs on order. These are not the figures in the fleet table so please stop adding this reference to support them. You may want to read WP:VERIFY, which is a basic policy here. Jetstreamer Talk 23:02, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer: Firstly, I appreciate starting a conversation on this, but I can't help but feel a condescending tone in what you are saying. The source I cited is literally as reliable as it gets - it is directly an official report from the airline. When you come here and act like I don't know what a reliable source is, of course I am going to feel that way and I hope you can understand that.
As for the issue you have with this - I am honestly not sure what you are are trying to say. Let's say we have this official source I cited saying the airline ordered 65 planes. If the article already says 5 were delivered (for example), then the figure for orders (on the article here) would say 60, no? Then if you add 5 and 60, that confirms the total figure in the airline's report I cited. Junk2711 (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What you mention is original research.--Jetstreamer Talk 22:44, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jetstreamer: Very pedantic application of OR but at least you could have explained your issue earlier instead of saying "unreliable source". Also, this is present in other airline articles - what do you propose is the solution for this? There's no live counter for these numbers, so only news when planes are delivered but not for an updated unfilled order amount. Unfilled orders are only reported periodically by the manufacturer and are not necessarily adequately detailed (such as not distinguishing between MAX 8 and MAX 9 figures). -Junk2711 (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a message on your talk page referring to WP:CALC. Thanks. -Junk2711 (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Turkish Airlines; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You warn me, I warn you. Per WP:CALC, "Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is consensus among editors that the result of the calculation is obvious". I do not see you looking for consensus with other editors in the article's talk page. Jetstreamer Talk 19:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please have some maturity and remember to assume good faith (WP:AGF). I genuinely don't understand why you're approaching this with a "you warn me, I warn you" attitude.
As for what you are saying, are you claiming that 54+11 isn't 65? 9+1 isn't 10? 6+24 isn't 30? I'm fairly certain that a consensus among editors can be reached that the results of these calculations are obvious. -Junk2711 (talk) 20:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of White Turks for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Turks, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Turks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:St Pauls School NH Shield.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St Pauls School NH Shield.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:St Pauls School NH Logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St Pauls School NH Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]