User talk:EditorUnitedStates

April 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steven Hotze. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jerm (talk) 15:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Steven Hotze, you may be blocked from editing. Jerm (talk) 15:40, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at Steven Hotze, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See discussion. Jerm (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked one week for disruptive editing[edit]

Wikipedia is not censored. Negative material about persons is allowed when it is properly sourced and undue weight is not given to it. Repeatedly removing it is disruptive. You need to learn to use the article talk page. Once you've been reverted, it is up to you to take it to the article talk page and discuss it, with the goal of finding a consensus. Blindly removing material that is negative but properly sourced is not only disruptive, but it makes us question your motivation for being here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information.ce As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

Please see UTRS appeal #42517. You have not addressed the reason for your block. Please reread the message on your talk page about dealing with content disputes. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS-- What Dennis Brown said. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for two weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The core content policy Verifiability requires that you provide references to reliable sources for new content that you add, if it is challenged Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]