User talk:Edward.jones.1967

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hungarian minority in Romania has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dusti^{complain/compliment} 11:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funar

Wikipedia doesn't judge whether it was right or wrong what Funar did or even if it is true or not. Please note that what matters in wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. (you can follow the link for more about that policy)

It happens that according to Reliable Sources (for example, The New York Times and scientific journals are considered reliable sources), Funar did what it is written in the article and it's going to stay that way.

It you have reliable sources of equal reputation which claim otherwise, you can add them, too, but do not remove what is already there, without a reason. bogdan (talk) 22:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. bogdan (talk)