User talk:Eelmonkey

Welcome!

Hello, Eelmonkey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --ImmortalGoddezz 23:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Zeta[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Delta Zeta. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Come to Delta's talk page -- we've discussed your concerns and your feedback is most welcome. Thanks! ∴ Therefore talk 17:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Chi Omega - CSU controversy[edit]

I rewrote this section with complete citations. I agree that it is part of the historical context of the organization -- a positive one in light of their immediate reaction to rectify the horrible actions of one member. I don't see how this compares to the Delta Zeta controversy which involved the actions of the adult officers of the national organization. If only they offered such an abject apology, the DZ controversy would have been settled positively. SmallRepair 19:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eelmonkey -- please review Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Thanks! ∴ Therefore talk 20:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smallrepair: I agree that AXO handled the situation very well. I was unaware that that type of content-current events if you will-was something that would be considered appropriate. When I learned that it made me interested in other groups "controversies" and how they were handled. That led me to the AXO information and that is why I included it. I was not trying to say the situations were the same at all. Perhaps I worded my reason for including it poorly.Eelmonkey 02:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dttcrest2.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dttcrest2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]