Jump to content

User talk:Eggochick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for signing in as Student Editor! Please let me know if you have any questions about this assignment. Hoopes (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jade. I checked your User page and the link there for "soft hammer" does not lead to any text. Please let me know if your draft is online and where it is located. Hoopes (talk) 21:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soft Hammer (April 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JavaHurricane were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 04:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Eggochick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JavaHurricane 04:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as if your well-intentioned article was not accepted for Wikipedia mainspace. Please let me know if you would like to do additional work on it in order to bring it up to Wikipedia standards. Please note the edits that I have made. The principal issue that I see here is the lack of appropriate tie-ins to articles on knapping and lithic reduction as well as a general dearth of reliable sources. While the Encyclopedia Britannica is a reliable source, it is generally not a great practice to simply reword content from one encyclopedia for inclusion in another. There are many much better sources on the use of soft-hammer technique in the literature on flintknapping and lithic analysis. The main problem here is a lack of adequate research and citation of relevant sources. Note also that the issue of WP:N must be addressed for new articles. Does the soft-hammer technique merit its own article? If so, that must be evident in the article's content. An alternative approach is to add a section on soft-hammer technique to the article on lithic reduction. Please consider the good advice of User talk:JavaHurricane above for discussing this. Hoopes (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Soft Hammer[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eggochick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soft Hammer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]