User talk:EkoGraf/Archive2018 2

Yo Ho Ho

Iryna Harpy (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.

$$

1RR warning

You have reverted twice. Your first changing of it was a revert as the article had been previously shown to have ended as well. That isn't good that after changing for the first time, you directly went back and changed it again. I notice you said on Aleppo offensive many times to have patience, but why can't you show it here? Please revert yourself, this isn't good behavior. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 02:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

The offensive has been edited as ended previously. And you reverted for first time. As for your other point, blaming me isn't good behavior at all. 1RR has to be followed. The limit which you are talking about is usually considered especially when there is an indication that one will edit war. I however requested a week back to talk. You however didn't discuss and claimed consensus and reliable sources agreed with you. Besides per rules 1RR is 24 hours, and I haven't made any violation in these [1] [2]. I am within the rules completely. There is no need for blame games, we are all grown me here. Please revert it, there won't be any large consequence if you reverted. I am simply asking you because what you did isn't allowed and it will increase cooperation to find common ground. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

When did I blame you or accuse you? What are you talking about not discussing with you first? I started discussion over A WEEK ago. Besides ONLY TWO separate times have I shown this offensive as open. And in actual I only reverted ONCE to show the offesnive as open again. And you have reverted TWO TIMES IN A DAY. Merely shifting sentences and adding or changing a few words here and there won't make it just your normal edit. You are accusing me of edit war here though. And manybe you don't understand, revert is not about how much older edit you have reverted back to. Revert is a revert and you have reverted twice. Please stop accusing me and revert if you are as you say open to discussion. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I reminded you of rules. That isn't meant to fault you or accuse you, merely meant in good will and to tell you to wait and let us reach common ground. Besides how did I violate 1RR? 24 hours is the clear limit. And I never broke it or tried to break it once. Nor am I going to revert you twice even after a day. Besides what four editors are you talking about? It was LightandDark2000 who first edited the offensive as ended. That's one. You're the second. Who's else there? Because I for sure didn't revert anyone else showing it as ended. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 03:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

You have clearly stated yourself that outside 24 hour period is in case of those being disruptive and potentially showing signs of edit-warring. And your claims I reverted "four users" who closed the offensive are utterly baseless. In actual only LightandDark2000 and you were the ones' whose edits I changed the offensive back to ongoing. And you are the only one I actually reverted, because while changing LightandDark2000's version of the page, I made a significant change in the article unlike you. Vorman only edited to change the result from major victory to victory , see his edit. Mehmedsons, never closed the articlr, he only changed the result stating SAA's actions of repelling all attacks (no ISIL attack has been successful), and retook several positions. $$

Bot is working

Updated your archive size to max 250Kb, changed number of days on talk page from 10 (240hr) to 100 (2400hr) since you are Semiretired. --DBigXrayᗙ 00:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Not sure why the bot decided to leave the above section may be due to missing signatures. I added "double $" to force the bot to take it off. SO in future if you want somethread to archive ASAP without waiting for 100 days, just add 2$ characters--DBigXrayᗙ 22:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Country Winners
• Diversity winner
• High quality contributors
• Gender-gap fillers
• Page improvers
• Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EkoGraf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Greetings.

Hello EkoGraf: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBigXrayᗙ 15:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Hope the new year will bring more friendly debates and collaboration for us. Best wishes. Cheers --DBigXrayᗙ 15:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)