User talk:ElectricSoap

October 2017

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Game of Thrones (season 4)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 02:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Game of Thrones (season 4). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Game of Thrones (season 4) was changed by ElectricSoap (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937141 on 2017-10-13T02:23:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 02:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #56933

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ElectricSoap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My previous actions definitely warranted a block because I was just clearly trolling and thought at the time it was funny, it's obviously not, and is not constructive to wikipedia, and causes other people to go out of their way to fix my actions. I wanted to provide an up to date and higher quality picture to the Ashton Dulin page since it is from 2019 and is really blurry and looks like a crappy flip phone picture.

Accept reason:

Per discussion below —C.Fred (talk) 03:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ElectricSoap (talk) 22:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am reluctant to address an on-Wiki appeal after a UTRS was filed the same day. Pinging @Deepfriedokra:. —C.Fred (talk) 02:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I just wasn't sure if I had posted the first correctly, my apologies. ElectricSoap (talk) 02:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: Basically, I told 'em to request unblock here, because unblock requests should be on the talk page unless TPA is removed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Thank you for clarifying. I figured it was 50/50 that the closure was to tell them to request on here. I wanted to confirm. —C.Fred (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also... @Alexf: Heads-up that I'm looking at one of your blocks. Given the nature of it, I don't think you'll object if I unblock, but courtesy says I should let you know. —C.Fred (talk) 02:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: Ok. No prob. Wow - 4-1/2 years! -- Alexf^(talk) 16:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given time elapsed and your acknowledgment of what you did, I'm willing to consider this request. You mentioned adding a new picture as one of your first constructive edits. Please tell me about the picture. Is it a picture you took yourself? If not, how do you know that it is a freely-licensed picture? —C.Fred (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's is not a picture that I took, it's a picture by AP, that is being used by multiple other news sites. ElectricSoap (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the original source of the photo is available online anymore. ElectricSoap (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If it is a picture taken by or licensed to the AP, it is not under a license suitable for use on Wikipedia, and a non-free image cannot be used in the Dulin article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, I will try to find a public domain picture then. ElectricSoap (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good answer! And don't forget to look for other places you can contribute to benefit the project. I am going to assume good faith and unblock your account. —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! ElectricSoap (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]