User talk:Elfer~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Elfer~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EdwinHJ | Talk 00:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fawn in Forest 2.jpg

Nice picture. Shame about the tree. -- Francs2000 | Talk 03:16, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Picture's actually quite nice in the uncropped version, tree looks a lot more natural.

Fawn in Forest

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Fawn in Forest edit.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~~~~

-- Enochlau 06:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elfer,

I'm in the process of writing a caption for this picture, to appear on Wikipedia:Picture of the day. However, I'm struggling to find good material from the general deer article. Do you have any more information on this fawn and its mother? For example do you know the location of the forest and can you describe the colouring of the mother (mentioned on FPC).

It seems that several species of deer have spotted fawns, even when the adults don't have spotted coats. I'm thinking it may be a Roe deer, which acording to this website shows a distinct line of white spots down the back. See also this picture that shows a younger roe deer fawn. However, I'm not sure whether this line of spots is unique to Roe deer.

By the way, I noticed that several of the comments on WP:FPC mentioned the lack of red in the original picture. Judging from the EXIF data on the original picture, it looks like the problem was probably that the camera was left with its white balance set to 'Tungsten'. -- Solipsist 13:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently asked me for some details about the picture so you could write a better caption. The picture was taken at the forest surrounding Desert Lake in southeastern Ontario, Canada. I'm not really an expert on deer, but this was, in fact, the second time I had seen this deer, the previous time being when it was in the same area with its mother and sibling. I can't recall the mother's colouring from memory, but I do have a few pictures from that time that I could try to dig up, so you'd have a visual you could use to determine which exact species it is.

About the lighting in the original: Yeah, several people use the same camera that I do, so the lighting setting is often inappropriate for the situation due to absent-mindedness. I am getting better at remembering it though.

Anyway, I'll get those pictures for you as soon as I can, and if there's anything else you need, just let me know --Elfer 21:17, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Elfer,

That helps, but I still don't think I can get to a definate identification of it being a Roe Deer fawn. Which is a bit of shame, because they apparently have an unusual gestation in which the mother can hold on to a fertilised egg over winter before becoming pregnant at the right time in the spring.

In any case, I had better play it safe and stick with the fairly generic caption I've got at the moment. The picture is up for Pic of the Day tomorrow and so should also appear on the Main Page. You can check and correct the current caption and credit at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/November 13, 2005 (and Wikipedia:Today's second feature/November 13, 2005, but that's the Main Page version and needs an admin to help edit it).

Brian Peppers

Regarding your keep vote on the AfD: I encourage you to come to the arguement for undeletion and support the arguement, so that we can bring this article back legally, so to speak. (The arguement for deletion was simply that it has been deleted several times before, and therefore should again.) --Aleron235 14:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Elfer. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Elfer~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Fawn, Southeastern Ontario, forest.jpg

The file File:Fawn, Southeastern Ontario, forest.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image of a young generic deer. Not enough information to determine future encyclopedic use nor clear enough license/sourcing for easy transfer to Commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 15:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fawn in Forest 2.jpg

The file File:Fawn in Forest 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image of a young generic deer. Not enough information to determine future encyclopedic use nor clear enough license/sourcing for easy transfer to Commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 15:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fawn in Forest.jpg

The file File:Fawn in Forest.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image of a young generic deer. Not enough information to determine future encyclopedic use nor clear enough license/sourcing for easy transfer to Commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 15:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]