User talk:Eliluu

July 2013

Hello, I'm Guerillero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Flash (comics), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Guerillero | My Talk 04:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Flash (2014 TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mario, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. None of the sources you have provided are reliable. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 03:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Serge, an Admin here at Wikipedia. I need you to calm down with all of your reverting if edits. It's referred to as edit warring and is not acceptable. Many of your edits are very sloppy with your wording. I need you to slow down, be more careful, and add reliable sources to your edits. If you don't stop with the edit warring, you could be blocked from editing, so please take this advice to heart. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 10:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Mahone - Promotional Singles

Despite what you think, promotional singles are also released to iTunes as individual purchases, as they have been with MANY artists over the years. See Lady Gaga ("Hair", "Dope", "Venus" and "Do What U Want", which was later made a single because of the amazing digital sales of the PROMOTIONAL SINGLE. Also see Jennifer Lopez ("(What Is) Love", "Girls" and "Same Girl" - all released digitally, girls even had a music video, but they are PROMOTIONAL SINGLES).

I could go on forever, but I think you get the idea. Your idea of a promotional single is outdated (things have changed since digital music took off), but if you would rather have an incorrect Wikipedia page, go ahead. I am tired of debating this topic.

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbieg2012 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ariana Grande discography

Hi~ Please don't be angry.Let's calm down.Your edit in Ariana Grande discography is full of mistakes.

You broke the format of table.It's such a stupid page that has a broken table.You know that.
The official charts provider and recording sales certification body for Denmark is IFPI Denmark!The category of IFPI is too large.
The market in Belgium is divided into Flanders and Wallonia.You can't only put the better peaks but didn't mark which region.
The single peaks SHOULD be corresponded to the album peaks.It's the regular format.You can see other golden discography pages like Lady Gaga discography ,Katy Perry discography and more.Who doesn't follow the rule?Hope you will understand it! :)
Bang Bang: the footnote on the table states that dashes can still be used to denote (the lack of) chart positions for albums that were "not released in that territory".)

If you have any more queries, don't hesitate to contact me!!! —U990467(talk) 14:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The single peaks SHOULD be corresponded to the album peaks.It's the regular format.You can see other golden discography pages like Lady Gaga discography ,Katy Perry discography and more.Who doesn't follow the rule?Hope you will understand it! :)"

U990467, see WP:POINT & read this. Eliluu (talk) 06:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well,I have seen that.But I still think your edit is full of error.I have asked other user to help.Let's wait & see.BTW,don't you think you should fix the table?It's broken now.It's very rude of you to said my deit is "disruptive edit".—U990467(talk) 14:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your edit but kept some.Besides the single peaks, you edit is still full of error.There isn't any format error in my edit at least.Please don't reverted my edit.I DON'T want to make the Edit warring.You need to know that.Please don't do any edit until we (you ,Sufur222 and I) finish the discussion.Thank you very much!—U990467(talk) 15:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 21:27, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've reduced your block to one week because you are the master, and the intention was to block your puppet indefinitely.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at My Everything (Ariana Grande album), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. STATic message me! 03:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]