User talk:Emgee1129

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dmartin969 (talk) 04:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 04:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emgee1129 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My Reason Here. Emgee1129 (talk) 12:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emgee1129 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry. I promise I won't do it again. Emgee1129 (talk) 02:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been vandalizing articles for at least the past six months (I did not bother to look back any further than that), and I see no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you at this time. I have, therefore, revoked your ability to edit this talk page in order to prevent any further waste of valuable volunteer time.

Should you, some time in the future, genuinely reflect on your disruptive behaviour and conclude that you can contribute constructively to this project, please contact WP:UTRS - but I suggest you wait at least the six months suggested by the Standard Offer.

Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Nine Days Three.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nine Days Three.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lockdown (House)

The article Lockdown (House) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2011

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]