User talk:EmmaRoydes
Firsties![edit]
[insert your message] EmmaRoydes (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Barbie (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Barbie (film) was changed by EmmaRoydes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871406 on 2024-03-22T21:36:18+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
LISTGAP at Trump[edit]
Please edit your essay so as not to disrupt the bulleted list. See MOS:LISTGAP. Or, I could do it for you. ―Mandruss ☎ 23:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.