User talk:Emma Adriana
| This user is a student editor in University_at_Albany/Information_Literacy_in_the_Humanities_and_Arts_(Fall_2021) . |
Welcome[edit]
Hello, Emma Adriana, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Emma Adriana, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Peer-review[edit]
Hello Emma. I have completed my review of your draft. Good work, and good luck! MD380 (talk) 11:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
WCI Peer Review[edit]
The information that was added to the Reports from the US section did a good job at staying neutral and the links provided included reliable resources that provided necessary information for the section. The addition makes the article more balanced as it provides statistics to create a clearer understanding of the previous statements. The Reasons for Underrepresentation section remains neutral as well and provides a balance as it shows the Kings' perspective along with Sally Haslanger's quote which was a good addition. I don't know if your lead changes are going to be written just like that, but it seems a bit choppy. I think the part about the gender gap might not be important enough to include in the lead. Overall, this seems to be a good start!
Morgandels (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
WCI Peer Review[edit]
Emma Adriana added neutral facts to Reports of the US. Therefore, these facts are significant and have multiple references. These references are reliable resources that were quoted throughout the text to get a better understanding. This additional information has a clear structure that supports the idea of Women in Philosophy and gives the piece as a whole a more balanced structure. What I would suggest is details. In my opinion, when you're reading Important topics, especially about social welfare, and readers don't mind learning or reading more.Samaria348 (talk) 05:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Braedan Lynn, Peer Review Response[edit]
Hello Emma, thank you for your impressive and substantial peer review of my edits. I have decided to remove my normative language from that one sentence and potentially change it further in light of more research. I will also add a small sentence to the lead section to introduce the concept of epistocracy. Additionally, I will use more sources I have prepared in combination with further content. I very much appreciate your feedback and I will use it to shape my further contributions. Good luck to you in wrapping up this course! Braelynn2000 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Printy13 Peer Review[edit]
Hi Emma! Thank you for peer-reviewing my article draft. Your suggestions were thorough, and I really appreciated the thought that you put into it. If you would like to see my feedback to your suggestions, I responded here.