MfD nomination of User:Everlast118/SecretPage
User:Everlast118/SecretPage, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Everlast118/SecretPage and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Everlast118/SecretPage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 18:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Your reversion in Abaqus article
I see no spelling mistake in the diagram which you removed. However, while patrolling Wikimedia Commons, I realized that this diagram had spelling mistakes in the past which are now corrected. I advise you to bypass you web browser's cache to see the latest version if you don't see it now.
In any case, I took the liberty of undoing your reversion in Abaqus article because. Although, if I am wrong, you are still welcome to respond accordingly and/or drop me a note.
It's a mysterious diagram, I confess but I think I've seen it before when I was looking for sources to rescue the article. So, if this diagram is relevant. My advise is that if the only problem with this diagram is its lack of description or spelling errors, we can always improve it instead of deleting it, right? Recreating it shouldn't be a problem. I think it is made by Office 2007, Office 2010, Office Web Apps or such things...
- Um, I tried deleting my cache and reloading, but I still see it spelled "Abacus" instead of "Abaqus". If that's corrected and the problem is on my end, then OK. I think it's an egregious spelling error, so if it's actually there it really shouldn't be used in the article. Since you say it's been updated, I'll defer to you. - EndingPop (talk) 12:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oh! Now I see! No, the problem is not you. I also see it, now that you mention it. In the past, the uploader had fixed three spelling errors and I though you meant those. I should have suspected that some might have remained.
- You have my apologies, EndingPop.
You can go ahead and remove the picture again.But, just to be on the safe side, try to be more accurate in your edit summaries, okay? Fleet Command (talk) 16:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program at MSU
Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you're listed as a Wikipedian associated with Michigan State University. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at MSU, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.
Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).
If you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone in the East Lansing area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello! There is an article that has been nominated for deletion regarding the Michigan State football team. I noticed you were an alumni, so I thought I would let you know in case you have any interest in participating with the discussion. If so, please just click on the Title as I have linked it straight to the page's deletion review. If you wish to see the article itself, it is titled Michigan State Miracle. Any thoughts, ideas, or edits that would help improve the page itself would also be appreciated! Thanks! Stubbleboy 17:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Ansys article draft
Hi, I work for ANSYS and see that the current article is a great start. I understand that Wikipedia’s conflict of interest rules require that I request another editor consider implementing my draft. The current Ansys article is incomplete and out of date. The proposed draft is attached here. Kelliatansys (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)