User talk:Eunomiäs

Eunomiäs, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Eunomiäs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jewish material culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jewish material culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish material culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A loose necktie (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Books of Kings. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to offer to show you the citations that I didn't want to add them to an uncited section. Should we cite the entire section line by line? It's just a summary of what is in the Book of Kings. Finding the citations for this is very easy and the content is accurately quoted in quotation marks it was completely unneeded add these tags. 22:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Sparta

Hi! I've reverted your edit as I'm not sure that this content belongs to the section you've added it to. Maybe you meant to add it somewhere else? Alaexis_¿question? 08:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My misgivings are not about if the section was the correct one but expert scholars contradicting each other "Isonomia is embodied in Sparta's constitution of equals...in a limited form...since among them nomos is despotes" and another source of equivalent value "Isonomia was not applied to the aristocratic regime of Sparta". Another one of the sources Sophist Kings spells it out: "There is a 'foreign' aspect to Spartan culture, an 'otherness' that it shares with ... Persia...and in their slavish obedience to their constitution..." Eunomiäs (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. In general, we should assume that the reader of the article is a non-specialist. As you can see the rest of the section is written in a way that does not require special knowledge (like what isonomia is). Maybe it would make more sense to add this to the Spartan Constitution article which is the natural place for a more detailed discussion of the Spartan government. Alaexis_¿question? 06:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]