Jump to content

User talk:Euromogul

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Euromogul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cirt (talk) 10:41, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Rutman[edit]

I've restored the article on permission from Cirt and reclosed the AFD as "no consensus". However, the article can be renominated for deletion by any editor. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya![edit]

I noticed your edit here. I think you are looking for Wikipedia:Deletion review. Arcandam (talk) 19:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked this account as I believe you are abusing multiple accounts.

Guy (Help!) 12:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Euromogul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only this account as euromogul. Don't see the correlation between the other ones. First a posting I did on a public person..Yuri Rutman..is removed after this issue was resolved nearly two years. Then when I appeal the removal that is substantianted by numerous third party news articles, imdbpro.com listings which accurately check all bio info, I am then accused of using multiple accounts. This is not true and I expect the courtesy of restoring both the Yuri Rutman listing as well as the unblock of my account

Decline reason:

I can't think of any explanation for the interconnectedness of these accounts' edits other than that they are all being operated by the same person, or by a group of people who are all working closely together for "Noci Pictures Entertainment." FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Euromogul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No connection to Noci Pictures or Yuri Rutman or 'group of people". Further, the issue here is that I am being accused of editing on behalf of the following accounts: User:Mediainsider72, User:Euromogul,User: Truebobjohnson, User:Palefacedsoul. Now it seems I am being accused of editing on behalf of only two. I am not Mediainsider72 and whoever was making additional edits to these pages from that account I have no control over. I am not TruebobJohnson nor Palefacedsoul. Do I need to add the information on 20 more film/tv producers and production conmpanies not listed on wikipedia until there is clarity here? Please unblockEuromogul (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As FisherQueen points out, it must be the case that you have some connection with Mediainsiter72, since you edited that person's user page; my guess is that you were using both accounts and forgot which one you were logged in to at that point in time. If that's somehow not your account, you're going to need to provide some sort of rational explanation for why you were editing another user's user page. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have changed the formatting of this request to make it legible, and left it in place for another administrator to review. You have not answered the question of why you have used this account to edit User:Mediainsider72, if there is no connection between these two accounts. It has been some time; did you forget that you were using the other accounts? Here and here are the times you edited that page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 05:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Euromogul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are asking me for an explanation I cannot provide. I am not mediainsider, never had mediainsider account. I wish I could somehow validate this with IP logs but once again, I am being grouped together with 4 other accounts which made edits, none of which have anything to do with me. So if by your admission 4 different people are making edits to the pages and I have no way of disapproving I am neither one of them, either I am a liar, there is a glitch in wikipedia, or you guys are going up against a wall that I simply cannot validate. Looking back at mediainsider and considering those edits were in fact down several years ago, I cannot recall who else at my work at the time (in another state!!) with 2500 employees was a wikipedia person...but the fact of the matter is..that any concerns on the edits and the authenticity of the information was verified. Please unblock. As I said, if I need to put up the bios of 20 other film/tv personas on here to starting with perhaps even this list to validate this http://www.thewrap.com/movies/column-post/ten-producers-who-will-change-hollywood-in-2012-36606?page=0,6 than I will.Euromogul (talk) 14:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The fact is that *you* made *this change* to Mediainsider72's user page. Not one of the 2,500 employees at your company, not someone using your IP address, not several years ago, but *you*, using *this account*, in October 2011. Now, it might be that Wikipedia's software has a fault and is logging completely the wrong editor against that page's edit history, or, as you suggest, it might be that you are a liar - given the track record of the accuracy of the Wikipedia software, I would advise you not to push us to make that choice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Euromogul&oldid=493540905"