User talk:Evktalo

Removal of links

Actually, have you even read the site's disclaimers and policies? — Wackymacs 10:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many people have said this to me, but ... what exactly are you pointing out on Mac Hut that is illegal? — Wackymacs 11:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No offense ... but you don't know what you're talking about - software does not have to be released as freeware to apply as abandonware. Sun Remarketing are still selling Claris software, because they bought it in bulk in the 80s when Claris still existed and were still developing the software. — Wackymacs 14:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it has no legal weight, then why on earth are you arguing over two abandonware site links in the first place? — Wackymacs 17:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't clear that time either, no. Those sites do not claim the software they host is legal because its called abandonware. In-fact, one of the sites hosts shareware, freeware and also demos, granted by the publishers/developers. — Wackymacs 15:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BulletML for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BulletML is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BulletML until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]