User talk:ExProfessor

Welcome!

Hello, ExProfessor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! William M. Connolley (talk) 21:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== where do you go to debate things? I have just put up things, but some obvious non-academic doesn't seem to understand that the Hoover Institution is part of Stanford University. It is almost as it the person wants to just list someone as economics department, rather than Stanford University. I also don't understand why Forbes magazine isn't a credible source for a quote.-ExProfessor (talk) 02:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice regarding edits relating to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Neutrality^talk 01:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A standard alert given to editors who edit on this topic. Neutrality^talk 01:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

where do you go to debate things? I have just put up things, but some obvious non-academic doesn't seem to understand that the Hoover Institution is part of Stanford University. It is almost as it the person wants to just list someone as economics department, rather than Stanford University. I also don't understand why Forbes magazine isn't a credible source for a quote.-ExProfessor (talk) 02:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Your edit to the article on the Kerch Polytechnic College massacre broke a link, and has been reverted. You changed Beslan school siege to Beslan school shooting. Toddy1 (talk) 12:52, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI

If you have an affiliation with John Lott or his organizations, you need to declare it, per WP:COI. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI x2

You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#John_Lott Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]