User talk:FaterNatan

June 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Temple in Jerusalem. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please refrain from adding unsourced commentary to WP articles. All new content requires reliable sourcing. Hertz1888 (talk) 16:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The previous "vandalism" warning was issued in error and, as you can see above, was replaced by a notice regarding unsourced commentary. Per WP:USERG, self-published sources are generally not acceptable. There is a broader prohibition of original research. The deletions are not a judgement of your views, but on account of their lack of referencing to reliable third-party sources. Please read WP:RS and WP:OR. Hertz1888 (talk) 18:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that - as a Sorbonne Scholar who has worked 40 years to find the Real Location of the Temple of Jerusalem - I am entitled to post any contribution to Wikipedia (in the same way as other scholars and without discrimination & SYSTEMATIC deletion for "vandalism" or threats. I dont want to convince anybody : I just want to make information available for all FaterNatan

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! FaterNatan, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 00:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please read WP:NOR. Our articles are meant to be based on what we call "reliable sources", see WP:RSN. Usually these would be:

Peer-reviewed journals
Books published by university presses
University-level textbooks
Magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses
Mainstream newspapers

Another of our policies is Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not which states: Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information. Per our policy on original research, please do not use Wikipedia for any of the following:

Primary (original) research, such as proposing theories and solutions, original ideas, defining terms, coining new words, etc. If you have completed primary research on a topic, your results should be published in other venues, such as peer-reviewed journals, other printed forms, open research, or respected online publications. Wikipedia can report your work after it is published and becomes part of accepted knowledge; however, citations of reliable sources are needed to demonstrate that material is verifiable, and not merely the editor's opinion.

This is the way we work. If the sorts of sources I mention above start to discuss your ideas, we may be able to use those sources, but not your website. Doug Weller (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]