User talk:Favorsky2013

July 2023

Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Wedding photography have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —Bruce1ee ^talk 08:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Bruce1ee ^talk 08:53, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Event photography, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1ee ^talk 08:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry bruce. i only just saw this Favorsky2013 (talk) 09:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Nursery rhyme. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about this will take caution Favorsky2013 (talk) 09:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

--Vsmith (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vsmith, all i wanted to do was to add meaningful and valuable information to wikipedia while adding some approprate links where possibe. i didnt even know this was a wrong move. and, i didnt even notive my edits were beign reverted not until hours later.

i now understand the conditions and i feel block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am blocked for, and will not do it again. Favorsky2013 (talk) 14:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, am finding it difficult to navigate the process of ublocking appeal Favorsky2013 (talk) 02:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{ Unblock | 1 =

All i wanted to do was to add meaningful and valuable information to Wikipedia while adding some appropriate links where possible . i didn't even know this was a wrong move. and, I didn't even notice my edits were begin reverted not until hours later.

i now understand the conditions and i feel this block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am blocked for, and will not do it again

reason ~~~~ }} Favorsky2013 (talk) 02:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Favorsky2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All i wanted to do was to add meaningful and valuable information to Wikipedia while adding some appropriate links where possible . i didn't even know this was a wrong move. and, I didn't even notice my edits were begin reverted not until hours later. i now understand the conditions and i feel this block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am blocked for, and will not do it again reason Favorsky2013 (talk) 02:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 11:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What edits do you intend to make? Do you have an association with the links you were spamming(especially Favian Photography)? 331dot (talk) 08:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]