User talk:Firinne

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Firinne, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your recent edit to an article that is part of the Latter Day Saint movement WikiProject. We welcome your contributions and hope that you will stay and contribute more. Here are some links that I found helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction to Wikipedia and Tutorial on editing
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Policies and Guidelines
Manual of Style
Manual of Style (Latter Day Saints)
Naming conventions (Latter Day Saints)

If you run into a dispute, please use the Talk pages and the Latter Day Saint movement project talk page to discuss subjects (especially controversial ones) to help reach consensus. But don't be afraid to be bold!! Also, as new Mormonism-related articles are created, please make sure to add them to List of Latter Day Saint movement topics.

Remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Teancum

I think your doing a great job on the Teancum article; please keep up the good work.

You may want to look at Talk:Mormonism#"Cites Religious text without citing sources which critically analyze those texts" for an explanation of the usage of the Template:Religious text primary on Teancum and other articles. These tags are not badges of shame, or criticism of the work put into the article; instead it invites any anyone that views that page to fix a critical issue with the page that would keep it from reaching a GA class rating. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your assistance in my editing. As I am relatively new to WP editing, I've not fully read up on all the details, so your experience is appreciated. Do you think that the Teancum article has enough secondary citations now? Also, what do you think needs to be done with this article to improve it? How can I help? Regards, --Firinne (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's good for now; it would eventually be useful if there were a few more secondary source references, such as an applicable general conference talk, a CES manual entry, a BYU paper, &/or a Dialogue article. An image that meets cc-by-sa would also be nice on the article, if one could be found.

If there is another article you'd like to have someone help you with, just let me know. I'm what's called a WikiGnome here at WP; I'm very good with some of the fine details, minor corrections, and other cleanup tasks, but I'm not as good with generating multiple paragraphs worth of new material. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 23:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Teancum Good Article Nomination

Hi. I am afraid I have had to quick-fail this nomination as falling substantially short of the GA criteria. Please visit the review page to see why. Please don't be discouraged as the work you have done is a good start - keep improving it and don't be afraid to renominate it when you feel you meet the Good Article criteria. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]