User talk:FlamemanTN

Welcome!

Hello, FlamemanTN, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 15:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FlamemanTN, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi FlamemanTN! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Certes. An edit that you recently made to Battle of Annual seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Certes (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i replied hella late but in the battle of annual its more of a manner of death not a KIA since that only happens by hostile forces the commander committed suicide FlamemanTN (talk) 12:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Darius (talk) 19:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Maghrebi war (1699–1702), you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how was that disruptive editing i manually reverted the page i didnt remove shit FlamemanTN (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ottoman–Persian War (1775–1776), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

did what you asked for and the result is still related FlamemanTN (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Tunisian–Algerian War (1807) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i just did FlamemanTN (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]