User talk:Fluri/archives/2007Oct

Regarding deletions at William A. Dembski

Yes, apologies. As mentioned in talk, for some reason I haven't pinned down (but possibly relating to brower, no idea) I unwittingly deleted three sections and could not get them back. (I went back to the bot's version, went to source, and then resubmitted, but even this did not work). Thanks for restoring.

The article in current form has substantial misstatements, however, which are what I was trying to correct. I will take this up later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.84.18 (talk) 19:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I saw that you'd been struggling and, after all, we all make mistakes. Please be careful when making edits so as not to inadvertently delete accurate information. And, please, let me know if you think I can be of service again in the future. Cheers! — Dave (Talk | contribs) 20:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane High School

Touché. :P

--TarrVetus 19:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chub

Hi... I saw your note about a proposed name change for the article Chub. You're an experienced editor, so you've likely already consulted these, but just on the off chance you haven't seen them, here's a few links that might be useful:

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna)
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names)
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)
http://www.fishbase.org/search.php

--Rrburke^(talk) 03:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for stopping by. I appreciate your thoughtfulness. Cheers! — Dave (Talk | contribs) 18:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Hi Dave, Thanks for your post and sorry for the delay in replying. Well, I'm soon going to go though all the examples in your post carefully so that I have a good idea of what I'm pitted against; but, for now, I'm just collecting more sources, so that my case is water tight in terms of convention. When I'm ready to go "Wiki-wide," I'll ping you once again.

I love that Monty Python skit, btw! More anon. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 01:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to admin tag

Hi Dave,

I noticed that you flagged 204.185.177.250 as being reported to an administrator. Is this a standard tag, or is your text hand written? Im using iwvand4 when noticing an user that they are reported, but your message is a lot more appropriate. If its a tag, could you tell me which one it is? :) --Excirial 19:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I just made it up on the spot. Feel free to plagiarise it as you see fit! :-) — Dave (Talk | contribs) 19:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a tag such as the one you liked, which follows all the conventions of the {{uw}} series of tags, and placed it at {{vandrep}}, save that there's only one level, of course. Try it out and let me know what you think. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 08:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]