User talk:Fran59

K49IH

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of K49IH, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: KFMP-LP. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
butt out, dhett, this dosen't concern you. Fran59 ^{(talk • contribs)}

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fran59 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

We aren't going to unblock the sockpuppet account; if you think you have a good reason that your ban should be reconsidered, you'll need to make the request at User:Dingbat2007. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abusing this talk page

If you continue abusing the talk page, including making false articles such as "affiliates" for Disney Channel, we'll simply block your ability to edit here, as well as elsewhere. If you have any intention of contributing to Wikipedia in the future, please stop now. Otherwise we'd be happy to permanently block you. Thank you. -- azumanga (talk) 23:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of KVHC-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KVHC-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVHC-LD (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]