User talk:Francis E Williams/Archive 1
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
18 February 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 24.l77.120.74 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
suspected sockmaster has edits minutes prior to and subsequent to edits by suspected sock with inapprops username, suspected sockmaster edited user page for suspected sock with inapprops username, suspected sockmaster and suspected sock both edited my talk page in relatively close temporal proximity 24.177.120.74 (talk) 05:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- HelloAnnyong—this edit 24.177.120.138 (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk note: Sorry, I don't follow. What makes you think Francis E Williams is the user of this sock account? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed - Heh, alright. I'll endorse. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 05:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Declined - 24.l77.120.74 (talk · contribs) was blocked to allow account creation, as such creating a new account is not in violation of WP:SOCK. Tiptoety talk 01:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Sock puppetry Investigation
Logs
Creation log
- 16:49, 11 February 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) created new account User:24.l77.120.74 (talk | contribs)
- 13:15, 10 August 2009 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) new user account
Deletion log
- (diff | hist) . . Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Francis E Williams; 01:41 . . (+331) . . Tiptoety (talk | contribs) (Decline CU)
- (Deletion log); 01:39 . . Tiptoety (talk | contribs) changed revision visibility of "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Francis E Williams": removed content for 1 revision (Other defamation/personal information issues)
18:41, 20 February 2011 Tiptoety (talk | contribs) changed revision visibility of "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Francis E Williams": restored content for 1 revision (RD6: Non-contentious housekeeping, RevDel corrections, notes, conversion)
Block log
- (Block log); 01:37 . . Tiptoety (talk | contribs) unblocked "Francis E Williams (talk | contribs)" (Mistake)
- (Block log); 01:35 . . Tiptoety (talk | contribs) blocked Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Francis E Williams)
Process
- 01:37, 20 February 2011 Tiptoety (talk | contribs) unblocked "Francis E Williams (talk | contribs)" (Mistake)
- 01:36, 20 February 2011 Acroterion (talk | contribs) blocked Anniewatashi (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Spam / advertising-only account)
- 01:36, 20 February 2011 Snowolf (talk | contribs) blocked AmericanPatriot1001 (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Vandalism-only account)
- 01:35, 20 February 2011 Tiptoety (talk | contribs) blocked Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Francis E Williams)
sock policy
Over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Francis_E_Williams, User:Tiptoety declined a checkuser request that had already been endorsed, with a reason that doesn't seem to make sense. What's more, I can't ask him/her/it about it, as zir talk page is semi-protected. Could someone either explain the logic there to me, or request a more substantial explanation on zir talk page, please? 24.177.120.138 (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:24.177.120.74
User:24.177.120.74, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:24.177.120.74 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:24.177.120.74 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —teb728 t c 10:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
This anon’s user page is being used disruptively to camouflage the relationship between: