User talk:Fredc6671

Fredc6671, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fredc6671! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Olympique Lyonnais (Women), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

MCWFC

Hi Fred. I thought it would be more productive to engage you in a chat here rather than constantly reverting. I was just wondering why you keep changing the Manchester City Women page? I don't think your changes are by any means totally wrong, and I could perhaps be persuaded to see the logic in some parts of them, but at present I just don't see the advantage to what you are doing - particularly the constant promoting of away games as the leftmost column, which seems to run against the grain of the way in which two-legged matches are treated in just about every footballing media. However, as I say I'd far rather ask you for your take on the matter here than just keep reverting.

Could you perhaps comment a little on your alterations? Falastur2 ^Talk 21:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello Falastur2, I'm new on wikipedia and if you want to chat together, you can explain me or help what i'm doing. I understand your position in english woso, but in UK and Eire you drive left and in rest of Europe, it's right. It's a bad habbit for me and you are reason it's wrong. Sorry for my bad english. Friendly Regards. Fred

May 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to FC Bayern Munich (women) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

For the record, why are you changing scores to use hypens (-) instead of en-dashes (–). Have you familiarized yourself with MOS:DASH? The heading of particular interest is "In ranges that might otherwise be expressed with to or through". So in other words, if The Wiki Warriors defeated the Traditional Encyclopedia by a score of 3 to 1, we represent that as 3–1, not 3-1. If you were adding them as hyphens, it would be one thing, but actually changing correctly formatted en-dash scores to use hyphens is mystifying. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Montpellier HSC (Women), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. And reverting without explaining is problematic. Don't do it again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Invitation

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

November 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snowflake91 (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fredc6671. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fredc6671. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)