User talk:Frugahore
Thank you for revising the message you left for Nzd on the user's talk page to be civil and for removing the parts that were personal attacks. I just wanted to remind you that it's important to assume good faith and to try your best to keep your cool, remain civil when communicating with other editors here, and to refrain from adding uncivil comments such as this and this (where you called Nzd "illiterate" and stated that the user was "just making stuff up to suit your ego"). Comments such as these are not in compliance with Wikipedia's civility policy, and (aside from that) they just don't add anything good to the discussion and will only make resolving your concerns more difficult :-). I just wanted to let you know that I appreciated your revisions to your message and that you removed these comments. Remaining civil and keeping your cool isn't always an easy thing to do, and I understand how and why editors can become frustrated or perhaps angry and resort to making edits based off those emotions - I just want to encourage you to keep your messages to the issue at-hand, and to remember that uncivil comments won't make any situation easier (at least for you they wont... haha). If you have questions or need any assistance, I'm happy to do so - just message me on my talk page. Thanks again, and I wish you happy editing. Best - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
The opposite of ease is dis-ease . Your come over here with none sense . You stalk me on Wikipedia . For you feelings and culture stinks . I don't give a crap about fitting in to you feeling gang . Stop gang banging me for you feely gang and passive aggressive smart arse mouth crap tt. Take a hike clown .
Now you're adding uncivil comments to this user's talk page... Your comment here where you call the user a "disease" is not acceptable and has been removed. Please do not add any more uncivil messages or make personal attacks toward other editors. This is your final warning. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 13:16, 9 March 2018 (UTC)- If this happens again the next block will be indefinite. Acroterion (talk) 13:17, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Virtue signalling Says you , you cheap shot arsehole . What did you get ? a penny , rack off .
You threatening block me from Wikipedia forever . You better give me you name and number you fascist dirty dog mongrel
- And now your block has been extended to an indefinite duration. It's clear given your recent replies here that you do not have the motivation or the desire to improve your collaboration with other editors and to do so in a civil manner. Purely uncivil collaboration and the use of personal attacks toward other editors is not compatible with Wikipedia's fourth pillar and how editors are expected to interact with others here, and your repeated responses made toward others on their talk pages (as well as here) show that the indefinite block is the logical next step. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.