User talk:FuegoFish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Fictional geniuses category[edit]

Hi, FuegoFish. You may not have realized that Category:Fictional geniuses was deleted after discussion here. It shouldn't be recreated without discussion. If you wish to challenge the deletion, you may do so at WP:DRV. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 21:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, right. That's pretty stupid. Still, I know better than to challenge the mighty juggernaut that is Wikipedia bureacracy. Trying to find fictional geniuses through hours of blind searching might be a complete waste of my time, but it's much easier than spending twice as long trying to persuade narrow-minded, self-important jerks that it shouldn't be a waste of time. --FuegoFish 22:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I Love You[edit]

For wiki theater.

Man, that was so god-damn hilarious! Thanks for that! -- penubag  08:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikigroaning[edit]

Your comment made my day. Thank you. --A. B. (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Are you mocking the Great Asperger's Council, sir?! They will herald a new golden age, where I no longer have to diagnose my own excuses for poor social skills! Where my anal-retentive, self-important obsession with articles about nerd culture will be a blessing and not a curse! YOU'LL ALL SEE!! But you're welcome. --FuegoFish 19:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

thank you, fuego, for that![edit]

...indeed, SIMPLISH isn't fictional: it's reality since graffity has been born... ;) ! regards, --Ullipurwin 00:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed merge of isotope tables[edit]

As someone who has maintained Isotope table (complete) and/or Isotope table (divided) in the past, your input is needed. User:Greg L is proposing (and prematurely executing) a merge of the two tables, each about 50k, into one table of over 100k. I am opposing it, and no other editors have commented yet. Please come to Talk:Isotope table (complete) and offer your opinion. Thanks, JWB (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Merger[edit]

FuegoFish: What do you think about option #3, which would keep the best of both worlds and would leave only one article? In case other options get added and the numbering gets changed, here is a historical version to show which option I’m talking about. Greg L (my talk) 20:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I have no opinion[edit]

See above. --FuegoFish (talk) 11:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The Return of the King[edit]

Please resume or at least archive the Bad Webcomics blog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.207.23.59 (talk) 05:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

No, fuck you. --FuegoFish (talk) 07:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
F... fuck ME? 66.207.23.59 (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, FuegoFish. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, FuegoFish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)