User talk:Fungwan39

Welcome!

Hello, Fungwan39, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as System of linear congruence, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jasper Deng (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of System of linear congruence

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that System of linear congruence, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Chinese remainder theorem. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chinese remainder theorem, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of System of linear congruence

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that System of linear congruence, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Chinese remainder theorem. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chinese remainder theorem, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your article

I'm sorry, but as-submitted, your article System of linear congruence is not suitable for Wikipedia, for the following reasons:

First and foremost, you have to cite your sources to demonstrate verifiability, even when something seems obvious, even in mathematics.
The idea of simultaneous linear congruences is already discussed by the Chinese remainder theorem article.
Wikipedia is not a how-to guide or textbook so it is not our job to give methods for solving simultaneous linear congruences. Such content is more appropriate for Wikiversity.
While less serious than the above points, it is expected that regardless of your English proficiency, you write with proper English grammar.

Please take a careful read of the above points before attempting to recreate the article, as I have tagged it for speedy deletion a second time. Persistently recreating the article will result in its being deleted again, and salted. Please don't let it get to that point.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also believe that your method of splitting of congruences is generally inapplicable. Take the set of numbers congruent to 4 modulo 8 and congruent to 4 modulo 12. This cannot be simplified to a system of pairwise coprime congruences. Its solutions are precisely those numbers congruent to 4 modulo 24.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fungwan39/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Fungwan39/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fungwan39: I know you are knew to Wikipedia, but first and foremost, you need to listen to what I've been saying about how Wikipedia works.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]