User talk:Fushiginahito

February 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Eric Steven Stahl was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eric Steven Stahl, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Eric Steven Stahl. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 05:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fushiginahito (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not familiar with Wikipedia and made many mistakes as I was entering information. Please give me another chance so I can update the information without violating your rules. Thank you

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 14:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given the three warnings up above and the fact that new messages are announced by a don't-shoot-me-orange bar near the top of the page this seems very disingenuous. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What you should of done is to ask the editors who issued the warnings about the unconstructive edits. You have continued to disrupt Wikipedia even with multiple warnings, and so this block is appropriate. --B music ian 09:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just an observation here folks. This looks to me like a new user who simply doesn't know their way round yet, and doesn't understand how to do references in articles. What I see looks like attempts to fix things without really knowing how to do it - so let's try to be a bit less Bitey, can we? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fushiginahito (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are right about the fact that I did not acknowledge the 3 warnings I should have asked for guidance back then. I am not tech savy and I honestly did not know how to work the system. Even when I read the warnings, I thought if I fix the things that were mentioned in the windows, I thought the warnings would dissapear. This may sound like bunch of execuses but I was honesly trying to cure the issues and get this page up. Because of the block, I now understand what I have been blocked for and I will not continue to cause damage or disruption and please be assured that I will make useful contributions. I appreciate your time and reviewing this case again.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: no response in 3+ days (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fushiginahito, I can unblock you if you agree to read Introduction and Help before making further edits and always preview before saving. Max Semenik (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to read Wikipedia:Introduction and help:contents before making further edits and will preview always before saving. Thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fushiginahito (talk • contribs)

I think what we're waiting for is for you to actually read them, and show us you understand them. Then we might just be ok to proceed here. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock reviewed | 2=I read the Wikipedia Introduction and Help Contents and I understand. I will alwasy do the show preview first and should there be any questions, I will alwasy ask for editing help before I save the page