User talk:Gabibb2

Welcome!

Hello, Gabibb2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Clothed female, naked male. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Curved Space (talk) 07:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Small penis humiliation has been accepted

Small penis humiliation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pls don't go on photo replacing spree

Pls discuss on Talk page before removing images. See WP:NOT CENSORED. A lof of BDSM images are there from a long time. Don't replace them just because you don't like them. Additionally, you seem to be putting pics of male submission after removing pics of female submission, but your pics too can be deemed as MOS:SHOCKVALUE, which you use justification for removing pics. Pls don't repeat this, else you may be blocked on Wiki. Thanks. 2405:201:6401:870B:7C58:41D8:FFF4:F471 (talk) 07:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lead images should be of least shock value; an alternative image that accurately represents the topic without shock value should always be preferred". You can't undid my revision, I replaced the old master/slave and pony play lead images for other master/slave and pony play lead images according to shock value rules. gabibb2 ^✉ 12:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have been contradicted though. You should discuss them on the relevant article talk pages to put your point across their, not edit war until you get your way. Just because the images shock you does not make it a global case -- that is what WP:NOT CENSORED is for. Ironically, you are not the master to us slaves here. Curved Space (talk) 09:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read MOS:SHOCKVALUE and MOS:LEADIMAGE. Wikipedia is not censored, but lead images should follow those rules when it is possible. That IP can't revert my revision because I'm doing what should be done according to the rules. A master/slave lead image with naked woman was replaced with another master/slave lead image of least shock value. A pony play lead image with topless woman was replaced with another pony play lead image of least shock value. gabibb2 ^✉ 12:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HalJor (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Master/slave (BDSM) and Outline of BDSM) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

22:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian dominatrices

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian dominatrices indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 19:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]