User talk:Galaad1k

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

-

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Galaad1k. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Kate Bush[edit]

Citing a French singer with a lack of wp:notability in England is not appropriate. It is wp:undue weight. Seeing your previous contributions you may be seen as someone lobbying for this singer on wikipedia. This attitude has to be avoided. Users have to be not wp:biased. Woovee (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

probono ????[edit]

have you been paid by Nolwenn Leroy to maintain her wikipedia page the shape she wants it to be ????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.97.79.220 (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

No. Have you been paid to vandalize her page with sexual content ? --Galaad1k (talk) 11:34, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Nolwenn Leroy[edit]

I see the talk about you on your page suggests you try to promote certain French singers.

If this is really about you just hating someone being introduced in a sub-national way, then I invite you show the same enthousiasm on Alan Stivell's wiki page and go bother them for using "Breton" to refer to someone registered as French citizen. At least be consistent about it.

@Ubister: I started a talk on your page several days ago but you didn’t respond. Why do you reply on mine now? You really need to read Wikipedia’s rules and stop personal attacks. Adding sourced material is not "promotion", it’s the purpose of Wikipedia. Otherwise you could also be accused of promoting Breton singers or Alan Stivell since you keep talking about him. And what consistency are you talking about? I didn’t write Stivell’s article, so go bothering someone else with that obsession. Your repeated edit is nonsensical and looks like trolling, stop it please.--Galaad1k (talk) 11:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)