User talk:Ganurap
May 2020
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ganurap, please take note of WP:NPOV: this is Wikipedia's fundamental policy about writing articles from a neutral point of view: we don't use any one nation's own point of view, so we can't refer to Pakistan-administered Kashmir as Pakistan-occupied. – Uanfala (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also, if you believe there are problems with the article Diamer-Bhasha Dam, please bring them up for discussion on the talk page. – Uanfala (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- thanks ,Understood the guidelines and posted the issue on article talks page
Ganurap, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Ganurap! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC) |
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.